The association stressed that while judges have the authority to maintain order and discipline in their courts, such powers must be exercised strictly within the confines of the law and established judicial standards.
By Ife Osemedua
365Daily – the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has raised concerns over an alleged incident at the Federal High Court in Abuja involving Honourable Justice Mohammed Umar and a defence counsel, Mr. Marshall Abubakar, insisting that no judge has the power to order a lawyer to kneel in court.
In a statement on Tuesday, NBA President, Afam Osigwe, described the development as troubling, noting that it carries serious implications for the dignity of the legal profession and the sanctity of the courtroom.
According to the association, the incident occurred on Monday, March 16, 2026, during proceedings in a matter involving activist Omoyele Sowore, where Abubakar appeared as lead defence counsel.
The NBA said reports indicated that the trial judge, in response to the lawyer raising his voice while addressing the court on the suitability of a hearing date, directed him to step out of the Bar and kneel, while also issuing threats of committal for contempt.
Reacting, the association stressed that while judges have the authority to maintain order and discipline in their courts, such powers must be exercised strictly within the confines of the law and established judicial standards.
“The courtroom is a temple of justice, governed by law, procedure, and decorum,” the NBA said, adding that the power to punish for contempt is recognised but must follow clearly defined legal procedures that ensure fairness and respect for the dignity of all parties.
It maintained that directing a legal practitioner or any individual to kneel in court is not a recognised judicial sanction under Nigerian law and falls short of expected standards of judicial conduct.
“The dignity of the court must be preserved not only in outcome but also in process, including the manner in which judicial authority is exercised,” the statement read, emphasising that any perceived contempt must be addressed through established legal procedures.
The association, however, reminded lawyers of their obligation to conduct themselves with restraint, professionalism and respect for the court at all times.
It noted that while legal practitioners are duty-bound to represent their clients firmly and fearlessly, such advocacy must be exercised within the bounds of courtesy and decorum, warning against conduct that could disrupt proceedings or undermine judicial authority.
Highlighting the importance of the relationship between the Bar and the Bench, the NBA said mutual respect remains fundamental to the administration of justice.
The association called for calm and restraint, urging that grievances arising from courtroom incidents be addressed through appropriate institutional and disciplinary channels.
It added that it would engage relevant authorities where necessary to ensure that the rule of law, professional standards and judicial ethics are upheld.