The use of bank accounts in the movement of TF funds has featured prominently in both intelligence and investigations related to TF
The Federal Government has said that foreign Non-Governmental Organisations, banks, financial technology firms and Point of Sale terminal operators have been linked to terrorism financing in the country.
It identified the affected NGOs to include those operating in terror-prone areas and engaged in humanitarian activities, service provision and faith-based activities.
These were contained in the 2022 National Inherent Risk Assessment of Terrorism Financing in Nigeria report. The report assessed the level of terrorism financing risks the nation was exposed to.
According to the report, investigations by security agencies have revealed constant interactions between the use of cash by terrorist actors and financial institutions, bureau de change, fintech firms and Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions.
Following the outbreak of insurgency in the North-East, many foreign Not-for-Profit Organisations commenced operations in the country but the assessment report said many of them had been indicted for TF.
The assessment, obtained by our correspondent on Monday, relied on data from intelligence, security, law enforcement agencies, Central Bank of Nigeria, Department of State Services, Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Nigeria Financial Intelligence Unit and various regulatory and supervisory agencies.
Other contributors to the report include the Corporate Affairs Commission, Defence Intelligence Agency, Federal Ministry of Justice, Nigerian Army Intelligence Corps, Nigeria Customs Service, Nigerian Extractive Industries Initiative, Nigeria Immigration Service, Nigeria Police Force, Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps, Office of the National Security Adviser and the Special Control Unit Against Money Laundering.
It said investigations indicated that current accounts products associated with BDCs and NGOs corporate customers were observed to be connected with terrorism financing activities.
The government observed that the abuse of the nation’s financial system includes movement of large sums of cash in high risk locations, use of illegal forex dealers to perform currency exchange and the use of multiple vendors by NGOs.
Overall, the report concluded that the inherent TF risk of NGOs in Nigeria is rated as high.
The assessment stated, “The findings of this report indicate that TF in Nigeria is generally associated with the use of cash. This notwithstanding, field information flowing from law enforcement investigation as well as financial data have revealed constant interactions between the use of cash by terrorist actors and financial institutions, Bureau de Change, fintech firms and Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions.
‘’The inherent vulnerabilities of each sector were assessed by the extent to which products and services offered are found in domestic investigations or STRs in relation to TF. Current accounts products associated with Bureau De Change and NPOs/NGOs corporate customers have been observed to be connected with TF activities.
‘’The use of bank accounts in the movement of TF funds has featured prominently in both intelligence and investigations related to TF.
“Financial data have also shown that the illegal currency exchangers comingle transactions in their personal accounts as well as entity accounts held and controlled by them with that of their BDC activities.’’
Suspects maintain bank accounts
In a particular investigation, the FG disclosed that almost all the individuals profiled on suspicion of having links to TF, maintain at least one bank account.
It noted that illegal currency exchangers primarily conduct their financial transactions through bank accounts.
The report further affirmed that the number of individuals engaged in illegal currency exchange business is very high as revealed by a recent TF investigation involving a large number of exchangers.
This, it said, has been brought to the attention of regulators and law enforcement agencies, adding that ‘’transactions through agent banking products, mainly Point of Sale payments and ATM payments have also been linked to TF.’’
The government noted that a larger percentage of transactions linked to terrorist financing were initially carried out in cash which were sourced from both legitimate and illegitimate activities.
‘’However, cash collected is usually placed into the financial system directly through bank deposits and indirectly through POS transactions and transactions with DNFBPs,’’ it said.
19 firms indicted
Investigations by security agencies had also indicted 19 firms linked with illegal money exchangers considered to be connected to terrorism financing.
The report added, ‘’Illegal money exchangers have been featured in several TF investigations. Within a three-year period beginning from 2019, about 19 companies linked to these illegal money exchangers have used their companies to comingle funds considered to be linked to TF.
‘’Illegal money exchangers are not under any form of regulations and as such, they implement any preventive measures. The activities of the illegal money exchangers provide a channel for moving illegally obtained funds for TF.’’
Though the government has strengthened the legal system with the enactment of the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 which expanded the terrorism-financing offences including a framework to implement Targeted Financing Sanctions against TF, the NIRA report admitted that terrorists regularly adapt how and where they raise and move funds and other assets to circumvent safeguards that jurisdictions have put in place to detect and disrupt their activity.
It explained that an understanding of TF risk would inform national counterterrorist financing strategies and assist in the effective implementation of a risk-based approach toward CFT measures.
In a bid to deepen financial inclusion, the report observed that the last two years had witnessed a tremendous increase in money transfers involving the use of POS linked to fintech firms, noting that the rising volume of transactions, however, raises concerns about the purpose of the cash transfer.
‘’For instance, in 2021 Nigeria recorded a total POS transaction of N6.43 trillion. These POS machines are issued by deposit money banks and Fintech firms. However, the narration of the transactions is obscured which raises concerns. Fintech POS conceals the identity of the sender of the funds at the recipient point, thereby posing vulnerability. More so, investigations have revealed that the POS operators have been used by kidnappers and their associates to move ransom collected from relatives of victims.
‘’In Nigeria, the banking sector, Virtual Asset Service Providers, Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions, Other Financial Institutions, insurance, NPOs and capital market sectors are the sectors that were assessed as being particularly vulnerable to TF,’’ the study further stated, stressing that the cross-border nature of TF can pose additional challenges for the identification of risk.
Arms trade donations
Apart from ransoms, the report noted that terrorist groups derived funds from arms trade, donations from sympathisers, trade in dried fish, proceeds from seized farms and livestock as well as human and drug trafficking, including sale of tramadol.
It further noted, ‘’For instance, two arrested Boko Haram kingpins who headed the tramadol trafficking ring had frequented the Zinder market in the Niger Republic for their nefarious activities. They specifically trafficked tramadol from Lagos, Nigeria to Libya, where they exchanged their drug consignment for weapons.
‘’The estimated annual revenue for the group during the period of the report cannot be ascertained due to insufficient data. However, from the record of law enforcement agencies, ransom payments to Boko Haram and its affiliates in the North-West by victims of kidnappings were estimated at about $19m within the reviewing period (2019 – 2021).’’
The NIRA report also said law enforcement sources showed that an estimate of N91m was raised by a few communities in one state in the North-West and presented to a terrorist group as protection fees in the last quarter of 2021 alone.